Lord of the Flies by William Golding - 784 Words

Leadership is the action of leading a group of people or an organization. Through the story, the Lord of the Flies, by William Golding, uprising or leadership transpired. Most of the conflict of leadership was between the two main characters, Jack and Ralph. One being the antagonist (Jack) who craved power and the protagonist (Ralph) who fought for survival and respect. In a group, their are people who have better qualities that best suits them for the role of the leader, in this situation, Ralph was the best leader. Ralph was the best leader for many reasons. Firstly, he truly cared about the people who surrounded him. Although, he was not always considered the strongest, Jack was, Ralph showed a better understanding of survival and the idea of diversity and responsibility on his deserted island. Ralph spent his time working to benefit the boy’s who were stranded on an island. Hes steps towards survival were humble, rather than vain like Jack. One of Ralphs understandment as a leader is to have stability within the group. The group of boys needed the essentials towards the continuation of their life, such as food, water, shelter, and other important materials. In order to create and maintain a stable environment, Ralph creates rules and consequences. Ralph also tried to accomplish to create a â€Å"democracy†, where no one was better than others and everyone had the right to speak as needed; the conch was an example where only one person was able to speak at once and theShow MoreRelatedLord Of The Flies By William Golding869 Words   |  4 PagesLord of the Flies Psychology Sometimes people wear fake personas like a cloak over their shoulders, used to hide what is really underneath. This harsh reality is witnessed in William Golding’s classic Lord of the Flies, a novel that is famous for not only its sickening plot, but also for the emotional breakdowns all of its characters experience. These issues are akin to those shown in certain real-world psychological experiments. A summary of Golding’s Lord of the Flies, combined with the evidenceRead MoreThe Lord Of The Flies By William Golding1347 Words   |  6 Pages The theme of The Lord of the Flies, by William Golding, is the reason society is flawed is because people are flawed. Although Piggy is knowledgeable, he has many flaws including his laziness and physical inabilities. Ralph is an authority seeker. He sets rules and laws, yet does little to enforce them. Ralph wants to be the ruler, without doing the work to enforce his laws. Jack is persistent. He is rude, harsh and violent in or der to get what he wants. He wants to be supreme. Piggy’s flaws areRead MoreLord Of The Flies By William Golding1123 Words   |  5 PagesIn the novel Lord of The Flies by William Golding, the characters Ralph, Piggy, and Jack represent important World War II leaders Franklin Roosevelt, Adolf Hitler, and Winston Churchill. Golding, who had served in World War II, was well aware of the savagery created, and used it to base his book on. Ralph represents Franklin Roosevelt , Jack represents Adolf Hitler, and Piggy represents Winston Churchill. Ralph being of the novel’s main protagonist is important in the outcome of the story becauseRead MoreThe Lord Of The Flies By William Golding1065 Words   |  5 PagesThe Lord of the Flies Essay The Lord of the Flies written by William Golding and published on September 17, 1954 is a story told about a group of stranded boys and their fight for survival against the wilderness and themselves. In this story many signs of symbolism are used by Golding to point out certain aspects of society that Golding thought strongly of. This story on first read may just seem to be a survival- esque piece of literature but, on a deeper look one can find Golding’s true motiveRead MoreLord of The Flies by William Golding619 Words   |  2 PagesGovernments are no different; they fight for power just like the rest of us do. They just do it on a much bigger scale. Qualities from Oligarchy, Totalitarianism, Democracy, Dictatorship, and Anarchy governments are used in several parts of Lord of The Flies that represent different characters and different situations. An Oligarchy is a small group of people having control of a country or organization. A Totalitarianism government is a form of government that permits no individual freedom and thatRead MoreThe Lord of the Flies by William Golding1306 Words   |  5 PagesIn The Lord of the Flies, William Golding creates a microcosm that appears to be a utopia after he discharged from the British Royal Navy following World War II. After an emergency landing, Golding places a diverse group of boys on the island that soon turns out to be anything but utopia. The island the boys are on turns out to be an allegorical dystopia with inadequate conditions (Bryfonski 22). The boys reject all lessons they learned from their prior British society, and they turn towards theirRead MoreLord of the Flies by William Golding932 Words   |  4 Pagesdiscussing two particular themes from a novel called Lord of the Flies by William Golding. Lord of the Flies was written in 1954 after World War II. Ruler of the Flies is a purposeful anecdote about something that many readers can’t really describe. Individuals cant choose precisely what. Its either about the inalienable underhanded of man, or mental battle, or religion, or personal inclination, or the creators emotions on war; however William Golding was in the Navy throughout World War II, or perhapsRead MoreLord Of The Flies By William Golding1383 Words   |  6 PagesAccording to Lord of the Flies is still a Blueprint for Savagery by Eleanor Learmonth and Jenny Tabakoff, the words â€Å"I’m afraid. Of us† first appeared in Golding’s novel 60 years ago. Lord of the Flies by William Golding follows a group of schoolboys trapped on an island after a plane crash during a world war. At the beginning, they celebrate as the y have total autonomy as there are no adults around. They attempt to establish a civilization but when order collapses, they go on a journey from civilizationRead MoreLord of the Flies, by William Golding1055 Words   |  5 Pages In William Goldings Lord of the Flies a group of English school boys crash land onto an uninhabited island somewhere in the Mid Atlantic ocean. Ralph, the protagonist and also the elected leader, tries to maintain peace and avoid any calamity on the island. However, Jack is neither willing to contribute nor listen because he is jealous of Ralph and has a sickening obsession with killing boars. Ralph has some good traits that help him maintain peace and balance for a period of time. He is charismaticRead MoreLord Of The Flies By William Golding Essay1475 Words   |  6 Pages Outline Introduction Short intro for Lord of the Flies Short intro on Gangs The bullying and group mentality demonstrated in gangs has resemblances to the characters in Lord of the Flies. II. Bullying/Group mentality Gangs Drugs/Loyalty B. Lord of the flies Jack kills the pig/Jack and Ralph fight III. Effects B. Lord of the flies Jack killing the pig aftermath Violence IV. Conclusion Gangs are considered a group of people that have a common link together

Logistic Quality Management System Documentation †Free Samples

Question: Discuss about the Logistic Quality Management System Documentation. Answer: Introduction: There are several crucial needs for the organization to have a good design and production of documents. The document management process has numerous benefits aimed at improving the productivity. Among these needs, benefits include the need to increase collaborations and communications across a wide geographical location which can be facilitated through the internet. Another aspect is ensuring a reliable document version control where organizations need to maintain current information. Document processing helps to increase time-cost savings where the managers can access documents faster for the decision-making process. Documents should be easy to access from any place other than the office. Besides, technology helps to improve productivity by reducing document processes such as editing, tracking and sharing. Organizational standards that meet the organizational requirement are based on several principles of documentation which include, factual, accurate, complete, current, organized a nd compliant to the organization (Dancik 2004). Document validation process is a process carried out by an organization to ensure that the documents meet the standards required. These processes have an influence on the design, testing and manipulating the documents. The process begins by validation planning where the decision is made for purposes of validating the system. It is followed by gathering where the documents are reviewed and approved. What follows is the testing protocol which ensures all the system meets the requirements. The system release ensures the documents are released for end users and if changes need to be made, they should not unexpectedly influence the system. The document production involves various steps. These steps include determining the scope of the document to ascertain the process that should be followed. This process includes considering the audience for whom the document is addressing. What follows is writing the title and introduction that describes the process by providing the context of why it has to be accomplished. Process documentation will describe the individuals who are going to be involved as well as defining their roles. Identification of the process boundaries should also be addressed by indicating the start and the endpoints. After, determining the output of the process is carried out which is followed by evaluation of the resources needed to perform the process. Brainstorming of the activities required is followed by way of listing (Saulinskas, Paliulis Meidute-Kavaliauskiene 2013). The listings are then used to develop a step by step process by ensuring that the steps are limited using subheadings. Expanding of th e steps is followed by ensuring detailed information is provided. One should construct a flow chart to provide the visual element of the steps. The information is then formatted, tested, reviewed and ensures the information is updated periodically. There are various costs that are associated with the implementation of a standard document which includes reworks, delays, re-designing, failure analysis retesting and re-inspection. As a result of advanced technology, it is possible to have a software application that is drafted for purposes of different computing roles of documentation process. These software applications are programmed that use computers to generate specific documents based on the functions that the application is meant to accomplish. This process is automated for purposes of improving productivity and efficiency in process documentation (Dixon 2014). Reference List Dancik, R. 2004, The Value of Document Management within ECM, Information Today, Inc, Camden. Dixon, D. 2014, "Service Providers: Deliver Long-term Business Success with Document Management", Image Source, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 18-18,20. Saulinskas, L., Paliulis, N.K. Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, I. 2013, "Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Logistic Quality Management System Documentation Development Process", Contemporary Economics, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 57-72.

In this piece of English course Essay Example

In this piece of English course Essay In this piece of English course I am going to be analysing a documentary called 14 Days in May. This documentary is produced by a TV Director who diverges with Capital Punishment. I will be focusing on the presentational devices used by this director in order to get his point across and how he tries to persuade the audience into believing that Capital Punishment is erroneous. Therefore this documentary 14 Days in May has been set in the state of Mississippi in 1979. It is about the story of Edward Earl Johnson (EEJ) who is an uneducated black male and has been charged with the shooting dead of a (white) police Marshall and the attempted rape of a 60 year old (white) woman. Now EEJ had spent the last 8 years on death row appealing the case and is to be executed in Fourteen (14) days time from now onwards. To fight EEJs lawyer Clive Stafford Smith has stood up for him. Stafford Smith has also won stays of executions in over 200 cases and has lost only 4 of those cases. This documentary exhibits the last two weeks of EEJs life, and its focal point is on the affects this has on the staff of the penitentiary and deathrow inmates, who are also on death row. We will write a custom essay sample on In this piece of English course specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on In this piece of English course specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on In this piece of English course specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer On the other hand the death penalty is widely used in the Southern States of America like: Texas, Alabama and Mississippi because of the issue of racial disparity; which is that recent findings indicate that there is unfair application of Capital Punishment in the United States, when examined in terms of race. These racial disparities include the two mentioned below: The race of those Sentenced: in September 2000, the Justice Department reported that African Americans, Hispanics and other minorities were considered for the federal death penalty more often than whites. The incidents of minority federal capital defendant account for 74 percent of such cases since 1995. So the statistics already back up from the very start the Directors argument that there is a flaw in the Justice system. By Race of the Victim: According to the ALUC, a study of Georgias executions found that, Over 60 % of murder victims since 1972 have been African American, but 20 out 0f 22 people executed during that period had murdered white victims. Georgia prosecutors seek the death penalty in 70 % of cases involving crime committed by blacks against other racial combinations. A Stanford Law Review study found similar disparities based on the race of the victim in Arkansas, Florida, Illinois, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma and Virginia. Again this all links back to the background history of Black people in the USA. It all started during the 18th and 19th Centuries slaves were taken from the continent of Africa to the USA. Then during the civil rights movement the northern American states wanted to abolish slavery, where as the southern American states like: Texas, Alabama and Mississippi wanted to keep their slaves because southern states had huge farm lands for the slaves to work on. So giving up slaves meant giving up money. But very soon slavery had to be abolished in the southern states as well, because too many riots and demonstrations started happening. It is still believed that black people are still treated different (usually badly) because of their race superiority. This connects with 14 Days in May because the racial background of black people in the USA is used by the director to suggest that black defendants are still treated unjustly in death penalty cases in the USA, mainly Southern States. Therefore there are just as many arguments against Capital Punishment as there are millions of different people. There are many arguments that the director of 14 Days in May puts forward, to persuade the audience into believing that Capital Punishment is wrong. He gives the audience the idea that Capital Punishment is used discriminatorily along racial lines in the USA, and he uses this ideas and expresses it through EEJ. So due to the history of how black people were treated in the USA, the audience from the very start fell sympathetic towards EEJ, because he is black man in a Mississippi Penitentiary and is believed to have an unfair case. The director very cleverly draws the audiences emotions and feelings even more by showing that the conditions after they have been put on death row, doesnt make their lives any easier on them as it mentally tortures the criminal put on death row and their families as well. And an Inmate of EEJ tells us that: Starting to realise tat it is going to happen fear as you wait in line for it to happen. Plus there is always the possibility that the defendant in innocent, so how would the people who execute this person live their lives knowing the fact the wrongly took someones life. This also links with the moral argument that every one should be allowed to live their lives and that only God should have the right to take life away. For the same reason the director specifically focuses on the bad effects of class and race has on the defendants case. So if you are poor you are not going to get a good case because you couldnt possibly afford a good lawyer, so your case would not be fought very well. On the other hand if you are black and poor in the state of Mississippi, like EEJ is. Then you can forget about getting a fair trial and the officer in charge of death row, LT Bobby Butler (black) backs this up by saying that: 67% of the death row inmates are poor, uneducated black males. The director specifically has included this statistics in the documentary, so he can get the audience to look on one side of the wall, because he wants the audience to feel sympathy towards EEJ and doesnt really tell about the crimes EEJ had been accused of and to build on his argument he also included this statistics: A recent study in the United States found that a black man convicted of killing a white is over four times as likely to receive the death penalty as a white man convicted of killing a white. So the director uses these statistics and links it back to the idea of slavery and how shoddily black people were treated. So even if EEJ did have the money he still wouldnt get a fair trial because of the colour of his skin. In order to illustrate his points of view the director distinctively chooses EEJs case because first of all he is an uneducated black man who has been condemned to death row in the state of Mississippi. So even without seeing EEJ you know there is something apprehensive there because according to statistics and the racial history of Mississippi State you would believe that EEJ didnt get a fair trial. This I think will cause the audience to fell compassionate towards EEJ because they have been presented with the information which clearly tells us that there is a flaw in the Mississippi Justice System. Where as there is also the fact that despite being charged with the murder of a white police Marshall and also an attempted rape of a 60 year old white woman, EEJ still pleads innocence. This gives you a very strong impression that EEJ is innocent! Even when we meet EEJ the audience has been setted up to add to this compassionate felling created by the director towards EEJ, because he doesnt come across to be like the stereotypical criminal you would expect to see. Instead he comes as being very clean and groomed; he isnt un-orderly like you would expect him to be. He significantly comes across as being very quite and calm, which makes him looks like a victim. The director explicitly chooses to show EEJ behind bars most of time. Giving the audience a feeling that he is trapped and needs people support to help him. So EEJs personality and conduct makes him stand out from all the other prisoners because he is shown to be thoughtful and we get this idea when we see him playing chess, this just adds on to the directors argument; that there are still racial disparities in death penalty in the USA. EEJs appearance causes a great amount of disturbance in the audience because he doesnt look like the person who would commit a crime, so I think it makes the audience want to take action about this situation. Behind every documentary there is an objective and a message that each director tries to get across to the audience. In order for the director to build his argument and get the audience to strongly agree on his point of view, he needs to film the documentary in a place where the events are realistic and you would expect such events to occur. Again that I what I think is the reason why the director chose to make the film in a Mississippi Penitentiary, because as the statistics already mentioned show that black people have been treated unfairly because of the colour of their skin. This gives a crystal clear message to the audience that there are racial disparities in death penalty cases. So therefore from the very start the director starts to persuade the audience into thinking that capital punishment is wrong because it is treacherously used in some places lie Mississippi. By making the documentary in Mississippi penitentiary the director tries to give a message that coloured people are treated badly I the southern states of America, all linking back to the time of slavery. In order to get his aim across and convince the audience into believing that Capital Punishment is wrong, the director uses the repeated imagery (presentational device) to remind the viewers of the history of slavery and racism that was is in Mississippi. From the very start of the documentary you see white guards on horses and the prisoners (mainly black chained together) working on plantations. Linking back to the slavery days when black slaves (chain gangs) worked on farmland and plantations and their white owners use to treat them badly. The director consistently shows repeated imagery of black men working on plantations, like black slaves use to do for their master before slavery was abolished. The white guards on horses symbolise the power white people use to have in the time of slavery over black people. This idea of slavery is backed up by these two statistics shown in the documentary: 67 % of death row inmates are poor, uneducated black males A recent study in the United States found that a black man convicted of killing a whit is over 4 times as likely to receive the death penalty as a white man convicted of killing a white. Both of these statistics add on to the audiences persuaded belief that black people are treated unfairly and they also back up the directors argument that Capital punishment is wrongly used along racial disparities. Most importantly you only see the death row part of the penitentiary, the audience never get to see the normal part of the prison or the death row inmates socialising with other prisoners. Also the repeated aerial shots of the Mississippi Penitentiary which cut in between scenes tell the audience how lonely and isolated these prisoners are, because there they are in this big prison and there is no one they could talk to or interact with, they also dont have any personal possessions in their cabins. This linking back to the idea that even thought Capital Punishment it self is wrong, waiting on death row mentally tortures the prisoners a lot, this being one of the most coherent arguments that the director of 14 Days in May is trying to put forward. Again the director chooses to show you repeated images of bars, keys, gates, barbed wire, doors and windows closing of the penitentiary building it self because the director uses them to be symbolic to freedom and justice. That specific kind of use of these repeated images makes you think that the system is flawed and Donald Cabbanna (Superintendent of Parchman Penitentiary) establishes this when he says: The system is flawed, but it is not a fatal flaw So the director creates a great amount of hatred and revenge in the audience by not editing this information given by Donald Cabbanna because he is one of the main officers working in the Penitentiary and he himself says that the system if flawed! For the same reason the director cuts from Donald Cabbannas interview straight to the part where the gas chamber is being tested, to build on this mood and atmosphere of hatred towards Capital Punishment and the USAs Justice system. The director does this when we for the first time the audience sees the gas chamber is when it is being tested on (black) rabbits. So it is almost as if the director uses (black) rabbits as being symbolic to what is happening to the black people. At this point in the documentary the audience would feel totally sympathetic towards EEJ. The director shows the workers laughing and joking: Say what you gotta say boy, this is your last chance. As they tested and prepared the gas chamber to make you feel as if EEJ had been setted up, like many other black people, who are victims of this fatal Justice system. It makes the audience want to take revenge for what is happening and becoming proactive against the Justice system. To add to the audiences sympathetic feelings created by the director he deliberately chooses to interview Donald Cabbanna (Superintendent of Parchman Penitentiary) in addition to EEJ, to get Donald Cabbannas opinions and views on the case, so the audience dose not think that the documentary is biased. Also Warden Cabbanna believes in the Death Penalty as being the ultimate punishment but does not believe it works as a deterrent. This also adds to one of my directors most central reasons for being against Capital Punishment. Which is that capital punishment does not discourage people because if it did then crimes shouldnt happen, adding to the audiences created beliefs against Capital Punishment. Just to make sure that the people dont fell that EEJ was chosen on purpose because he looks innocent the director chooses to interview an Inmate of EEJs. He also comes across to be very introspective like most prisoners are and also very quite, and even the Inmate adds on to the directors argument that the prisoners get mentally tortured by saying: Starting to realise that it is going to happen fear as you wait in line for it to happen So his opinion makes it extraordinarily clear that the prisoners are indeed mentally tortured while on death row and even the Guards and Wardens get affected by it. That being the reason why Donald Cabbanna understands why Wardens in the past have ended up being against the death row, which just adds even more to the arguments explored by the director against the death penalty in this documentary. On the other hand for the audience to be completely stratified by the directors view, they have to be fully satisfied with EEJs. Meaning that the audience must felling really passionate, and The family at length supporting Johnson in his last days and hours to get you emotionally ardent about his life involved in the case, so you are more in favour of EEJ. The director uses the shot when EEJ is singing with his family to stir up the emotional feelings created for EEJ, the director is trying to persuade you into felling sympathetic towards EEJ. The Chaplin is not at all in favour of Capital Punishment as he believes in the moral argument that god gave life and only god can take life away, which makes him believe that Death row is wrong as well. Including the Chaplins view is important as well to get the religious people involved into this case as well and the audience dont go away thinking that EEJ was really a criminal. To provoke positive reactions from the audience the director uses the Countdown style of the film because it gives you the feeling that time is running out and by using the Countdown approach in EEJs case it makes you think that innocent people are being persecuted as Capital punishment is being wrongly used along racial disparities in death penalty cases. Most importantly to make the audience believe in hidden reality, real reality needs to be shown. So I think that Johnson wanted the camera present in his last hours and minutes, for the people to see what the truth really was, this adds passionate felling towards the film. It made me personally feel sorry for EEJ but also made me against capital punishment. It makes the audience want to take action against the Justice System in the USA. Just to make sure that the audience goes away thinking or taking action against the reality, the director needed the conclusion of the case. And who could do that well than the lawyer himself, who ends the film by saying: Its a sick world This statement makes the audience think really in depth if capital punishment and if it is right? The information which proves Johnsons freedom is given as a ticker tape: Since EEJ was executed his lawyers have located a black woman who was with EEJ in a pool hall throughout the time of the crime. At that time, she went to the courthouse to volunteer her testimony but was told by a white law enforcement officer to go home and mind her own business. The ticker tape is used to conclude the case and it is specifically used by the director to provoke reactions in the audience so they get insight of the story. Therefore I personally believe that Capital Punishment is acceptable because I am Muslim and in Islam it says that we should punish the bad even with death. However watching the documentary 14 Days in May has made me think if Capital Punishment should be or shouldnt be allowed. That is because of the arguments put forward, such as: there is always a possibility that the defendant is innocent, also people dont always get a fair trial either because their race or economic status. Also the family of the defendant goes through mental torture. These arguments have indeed persuaded my belief in Capital Punishment, and I have been persuaded to go against capital punishment. I think that television documentary can be objective and neutral in some cases. Usually it takes one side of the story. Like in EEJs case they say he is innocent but they dont really look into the fact he shot the police Marshall dead 5 times.

Stare Decisis Definition - Honor Past Precedents

Stare Decisis Definition - Honor Past Precedents Stare decisis (Latin: stand by the decision) is a legal phrase referring to the obligation of courts to honor past precedents.There are essentially two types of stare decisis. One is the obligation that trial courts have to honor the precedents of higher courts. A local trial court in Mississippi cannot legally convict a person for flag desecration, for example, because of a higher court- the U.S. Supreme Court- ruled in Texas v. Johnson (1989) that a flag desecration is a form of constitutionally protected speech.The other concept of stare decisis is the obligation of the U.S. Supreme Court to honor past precedents. When chief justice appointee John Roberts was questioned before the U.S. Senate, for example, it was widely believed that he does not accept the concept of an implicit constitutional right to privacy, upon which the Courts decision in Roe v. Wade (1973) legalizing abortion was based. But he implied that he would uphold Roe despite any personal reservations due to his com mitment to stare decisis. Justices have different levels of commitment to stare decisis. Justice Clarence Thomas, a conservative jurist who often sides with Chief Justice Roberts, does not believe that the Supreme Court is bound by stare decisis at all.Stare decisis doctrine isnt always cut and dry when it comes to protecting civil liberties. While it can be helpful concept vis-a-vis the preservation of rulings that protect civil liberties, excessive commitment to stare decisis would have prevented such rulings from being handed down in the first place. Proponents of civil liberties hope that conservative justices support precedents set by the anti-segregation ruling Brown v. Board of Education (1954) on the basis of stare decisis, for example, but if the justices who handed down Brown had felt similarly about the separate but equal pro-segregation precedent set in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), stare decisis would have prevented Brown from being handed down at all. Pronunciation: star-ray dee-sigh-sus Also Known As: adherence to precedent; stare decisis is also similar, albeit not identical, to the concept of judicial restraint Common Misspellings: stare dicisis, stare decises

Compare and contrast between stepford Wives and Black Sunday movies Essay

Compare and contrast between stepford Wives and Black Sunday movies - Essay Example The two films’ similarity is experienced in the different perspectives that are displayed by the different casts in both films; the presence of this diversity of perspectives adding to the enrichment of the films. Another similarity being that the context under which both the movies were based upon is mainly from the feminine perspective; in the former from Dahlia Iyad and the public in general while in the latter from Joanna and the rest of the Stepford womenfolk. Women’s roles in both films are defined as being home keepers and caretakers, thus the women should mind their own business and leave the men to play their roles. This is best displayed by the stepford women’s submissiveness to their gendered roles i.e. the cleaning, cooking and washing of dishes and clothing. When the men are having a game of golf, it is the womenfolk who act as the caddies; this adding to their submissiveness. The themes of Conspiracy and paranoia are present in both films. in Black Sunday, it is displayed in a number of scenes such as that where Dahlia and other members of the terrorist organization ‘Black Panther’ are held at gunpoint with the discovery of the pre-recorded message, by Dahlia taking credit for the attack; the fact that the terrorists could use unlikely objects to create dangerous weapons i.e. the Madonna statues, the blimp, the camera-like machine and the special dart gun. Also in the scene where Dahlia wears a nun’s uniform on her mission to murder the partner of Kabakov. The dual partnership, between an American war veteran and an emotionally scarred woman, to plot and carry out a terror attack further deepens the conspiracy theme. Paranoia as a theme is expressed in the scenes as portrayed from the anti-terror forces’ perspective; this is exemplified by Israeli agent Kabakov’s role in aiding the United States government in preventing the attack. The fact

Nursing Informatics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Nursing Informatics - Essay Example The affiliation of the sponsors are outlined in the copyright section where the website delineates affiliation to credible sources such as the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database Consumer Version, A.D.A.M. Medical Encyclopedia, Patient Education Institute, Merriam-Webster Medical Dictionary, ORLive, HealthDay and Reuters, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. There isn’t a link identified that will allow the user to contact the author however, Medline Plus has provided a contact form to answer users’ queries and if user’s browser does not work with forms, alternative emails and phone number are provided to communicate queries directly to the customer service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. Funding. Most of the content of Medline Plus website is available at no charge. That is because the primary purpose of Medline Plus website is merely educational and not to sell product or service. Commer cial funding is not stated in the website but in the disclaimer section, it has been stated that the U.S. government provides fund for the website. Some advertisements are present in the website but Medline Plus makes sure that advertisers follow the advertising policy of Medline Plus by clearly stating the difference between content and advertising. Advertisers or sponsors must not play a role in selecting or editing information (Medline Plus, 2011). Advertisements and directories of health professionals, services, and facilities might be included in the website but Medline Plus does not recommend or endorse these services. In addition, any potential conflict of interest with the users will exclude linked organizations and Web sources from the... This essay discusses the connections between profesional nursing work and an Internet source named Medline Plus that is a most common and helpful today for health care employees. It is stated that some nurses prefer the Internet in answering clinical questions and searching for updates in the field of health care. In this case, nurses who are often using Internet searches are encouraged to develop a list of trusted health-information websites known for credibility. Several advance skills are necessary to evaluate and appraise a health-related website as well as a criterion guide to ensure the quality of websites being accessed routinely. The researcher develops the website critique which will be evaluated the Medline website in terms of source, funding, and validity. Medline plus caters links to different sources which specified individual authors of various specific articles. Medline Plus is being sponsored by the National Institutes of Health. Most of the nurses around the globe vi ewed Medline plus as a credible source of information due to the reason that the information. The researcher also uses The Thede and Sewell criterion in critiquing a Website that is a very important tool not only for the health-allied professionals but also to the general users. The researcher then sums up that this website offers safety and security of information of users, credibility of author, protection of users’ interests, updated information free from biases, and preservation of users’ privacy.

The Brethren Book Report Essay Example for Free

The Brethren Book Report Essay The Brethren, written by John Grisham, takes places at Trumble, a minimum-security federal prison in Florida. The Brethren is a group of three judges in the prison that started meeting together to settle disputes among the other inmates. Meeting in the library at Trumble, their section of the prison, the three plan a scam to earn a little money while serving time. Their plan for earning the money is the Angola scam. The Angola scam works by putting an advertisement in a gay magazine saying they are searching for a pen-pal. Writing as a young gay male named Ricky living in a rehab facility; the Brethren try to pick out rich closeted gay males, who have a lot to lose if this information were to be revealed. In order for the closeted male’s homosexuality not to be revealed to the public, the group demands large sums of money to be wired into their bank account. The Brethren’s lawyer, Trevor, also plays a crucial part in the scam. He is the one who brings the mail in and out of Trumble, and he also runs the offshore bank accounts in the Bahamas where the scam money is wired into. Helping with the scam, Trevor receives thirty-three percent of all the earnings. While the Brethren are running their scam in Trumble, Presidential campaigns begin to kick in high gear as the Presidential election nears. Teddy Maynard, the director of the CIA, believes that future Russian attacks are inevitable and maybe even a third world war. With military cuts continuing to happen, he believes that the United States need to increase the size and strength of their military. His goal is to get a presidential candidate into the White House that will increase the military budget. Teddy finds his answer with Aaron Lake, a Congressman from Arizona. Seeming to have a clean background, Teddy proposes what he believes will happen in the future and promises to get Lake into the White House as long as he increases the military’s budget once president. Lake agrees to the terms and jumps into the election as an independent. Though Lake is now in the presidential race, he is at an extreme disadvantage from the rest of the field as no one in the country knows who he is. Luckily though he has an incredible supporting cast surrounding him and what seems to be an endless supply of money. Aaron Lake looks as if he has an excellent shot at winning the presidency as long as nothing comes to jeopardize him as a candidate. Repeatedly checking the background of Aaron Lake many times before backing him with his presidential campaign, Teddy Maynard and the CIA thought they had not missed anything. Aaron Lake had been a man living the later part of his life in mostly solitary. His wife had died a few years before and he did not have the motive for much of social life anymore. Aside from his job he would occasionally attend socials and parties but this was only to keep his face familiar with people. Though he did not go out on a limb much, Lake did write two letters to Ricky, both of which the CIA did not know about. Not knowing that Aaron Lake was Teddy’s presidential candidate, the Brethren try to hook and obtain money from Lake with their Angola scam. Trying to stop what the Brethren had managed to do, the CIA works hard trying to cease the damage. Unfortunately it is to late though, as a leak of the situation has gotten out. In order for Aaron Lake not to be exposed to the public, Teddy uses all of his experience in illegal maneuvering to save Lake, his candidate. Sensing as they cannot trust Trevor anymore, the Brethren decides to fire him. Through a series of unfortunate events, Trevor ends up being killed by people from the CIA while he was in the Caribbean. Eager to find out the masterminds behind the scam, the CIA traces the scam to Trumble where they place man inside of the federal prison. The Brethren is finally caught for their running of the Angola scam. After working out a deal, the group is pardoned by Lake and only lose their money in the process. Once the Brethren gets off the hook for their scam they decide to leave the country. They begin to travel in Europe until ultimately re-starting their work with the Angola scam.